News
Continuing to believe that you can litigate as if it were 1999 ignores today’s realities. There’s no denying the fact that the industry and its practices have fundamentally changed. You either fight that reality or embrace it.
Continuing to believe that you can litigate as if it were 1999 ignores today’s realities. There’s no denying the fact that the industry and its practices have fundamentally changed. You either fight that reality or embrace it.
April 14, 2021
We are looking to hire an associate with 2 to 4 years of experience to grow with us and to support our clients.
July 29, 2020
The applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident that took place on December 16, 2016 and sought benefits pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS, “the Schedule”).
November 12, 2019
The Court of Appeal ruled recently on the applicable limitation period for claims for the benefits available to individuals injured as a result of involvement in an automobile accident. In the decision of Tomec v. Economical (2019 ONCA 882), the Court of Appeal held that the limitation period is subject to discoverability, essentially finding that a claimant must know that they are potentially entitled to a benefit before a denial of such a benefit can be effective at ‘starting the clock’ for the limitation period associated with challenging an insurer’s denial to pay a benefit.
October 24, 2019
Ontario is making changes to the rules governing the Simplified Procedure under Rule 76 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
September 23, 2019
The applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident that took place on February 1, 2012 and sought benefits pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS, “the Schedule”). The applicant’s claim for IRBs was denied by the respondent on March 5, 2015.
August 8, 2019
Applications were brought by MG’s wife and two sons as a result of his death. The insurer denied benefits on the basis that the death was not caused by the accident.
Adjudicator, Robert Watt, found that MG’s death was not caused by the accident, and the Applicants were therefore not entitled to death and/or funeral benefits.
April 24, 2019
Check out the article that Michael wrote for the Without Prejudice publication on the timely issue of opioid addiction and the potential for increased tort exposure! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or if we can be of assistance.
December 5, 2018
In two companion decisions, the Court of Appeal has clarified that both past and future AB Benefits are deductible in tort actions even when there is not a strict matching of the amounts owing to a Plaintiff. The Court of Appeal also addressed (in obiter) whether a tort defendant could be required to compensate a plaintiff for its costs of pursuing AB benefits.
READ MORE
October 16, 2018
In advance of cannabis legalization Michael Blinick comments on the anticipated risks for business risk managers.
READ MORE
July 23, 2018
Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Nightingale following 3 week trial. The action dealt with whether a post-accident stroke and ensuing impairments were caused by the motor vehicle accident that took place 2 years earlier and the Plaintiff’s entitlement to damages.
READ MORE
July 16, 2018
Chistopher Lamm
The Superior Court of Justice in Ontario recently examined whether a driver is obligated to ensure that adult passengers wear their seatbelts while travelling in motor vehicles in the case of Stewart v. The Corporation of the Township of Douro-Dummer.
READ MORE
June 20, 2018
The Honourable Justice Thorburn, on behalf a 3 judge panel, released the reasons in the case of Mary Shuttleworth v. License Appeal Tribunal. The subject action was commenced after an Arbitrator with the License Appeal Tribunal found that Ms. Shuttleworth did not suffer a catastrophic impairment as a result of a motor vehicle accident.
READ MORE
June 12, 2018
Barry Marta and Jillian Beaulieu
Jury verdict in Oshawa on June 12, 2018 after 17-day trial. The plaintiff was 34 years old when involved in a snowmobile accident on February 28, 2010. He reported to the ambulance paramedics and at the emergency department that he injured his right shoulder, left hip and right knee. The emergency discharge diagnosis was soft tissue injuries.
READ MORE
May 4, 2018
The plaintiff sued the defendants for damages of $5 million for loss of his hand from an injury sustained during a tug-of-war game at the defendants’ campground. The defendants commenced a Third-Party Claim against nine participants in the tug-of-war game.
READ MORE